Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
DebateIsland.com is the largest online debate website globally where anyone can anonymously and easily debate online, casually or formally, while connecting with their friends and others. Users, regardless of debating skill level, can civilly debate just about anything online in a text-based online debate website that supports five easy-to-use and fun debating formats ranging from Casual, to Formalish, to Lincoln-Douglas Formal. In addition, people can improve their debating skills with the help of revolutionary artificial intelligence-powered technology on our debate website. DebateIsland is totally free and provides the best online debate experience of any debate website.
Debra AI Prediction
Post Argument Now Debate Details +
Arguments
Maybe if I explain it another way, a little more graphically, seeing you don't like my tactful descriptor of "proclivity". What is a pencil designed to do? It's a utensil for us to write with Although we CAN shove it up our rectum, we must acknowledge that's not the purpose it was designed for. Right? What is a phallus designed to do? To impregnate a women via her vagina. Although we CAN shove it up our partner's rectum, we must acknowledge that's not the purpose it was designed for. Right? It's a depravity. It's also not the purpose of marraige, because marriage is not a depravity, therefore it cannot be used as a definition of marriage, either. Get it?
  Considerate: 27%  
  Substantial: 78%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 85%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7  
  Sources: 1  
  Relevant (Beta): 82%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 93%  
  Substantial: 48%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 80%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 4.84  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 64%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 90%  
  Substantial: 32%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 80%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 4.96  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: Duplicate post    nbsp      
  Relevant (Beta): 85%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 90%  
  Substantial: 32%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 80%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 4.96  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: Duplicate post    nbsp      
  Relevant (Beta): 85%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 90%  
  Substantial: 32%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 80%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 4.96  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: Duplicate post    nbsp      
  Relevant (Beta): 85%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 90%  
  Substantial: 32%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 80%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 4.96  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: Duplicate post    nbsp      
  Relevant (Beta): 85%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 91%  
  Substantial: 25%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 75%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.22  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: Duplicate Post         
  Relevant (Beta): 49%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 90%  
  Substantial: 27%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.22  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: Duplicate Post         
  Relevant (Beta): 89%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 90%  
  Substantial: 27%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.22  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: Duplicate Post         
  Relevant (Beta): 89%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 90%  
  Substantial: 27%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.22  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: Duplicate post         
  Relevant (Beta): 89%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 91%  
  Substantial: 25%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 75%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.22  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: Duplicate Post         
  Relevant (Beta): 49%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 90%  
  Substantial: 32%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 80%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 4.96  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: Duplicate post    nbsp      
  Relevant (Beta): 85%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 90%  
  Substantial: 27%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.22  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: Duplicate post         
  Relevant (Beta): 89%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 91%  
  Substantial: 25%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 75%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.22  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: Duplicate Post         
  Relevant (Beta): 49%  
  Learn More About Debra
Stars formed, planets coalesced, and on at least one of them life took root.
Through a long process of evolution this life developed into the human race.
Humans conquered fire, built complex societies and advanced technology .
All of that so we can argue about nothing.
  Considerate: 79%  
  Substantial: 8%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 0%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6.28  
  Sources: 2  
  Relevant (Beta): 90%  
  Learn More About Debra
Technically that isn't ad hominem because I am not stating flaws in you as a person.
Ad hominem would be:
"you can't talk about homosexual marriage laws, you are a heterosexual"
Stars formed, planets coalesced, and on at least one of them life took root.
Through a long process of evolution this life developed into the human race.
Humans conquered fire, built complex societies and advanced technology .
All of that so we can argue about nothing.
  Considerate: 73%  
  Substantial: 62%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 84%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.96  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 93%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 76%  
  Substantial: 25%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 3.4  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: big toe    comfort      
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
And so what if that is what I want to do? Who are you to judge?
About 10% of people have a foot fetish. That means that if you know 100 people, 10 of them will have a thing for feet.
There is a good chance you have a thing for feet.
But wait!
That isn't what feet are "designed" for!
I guess all those people are wrong and we should make laws banning foot and shoe fetishes it because it is a "proclivity".
This is fair to everyone though because it applies to everyone equally...
Even though the people who aren't into feet stuff aren't interested in it anyways...
Why don't you answer that? Why shouldn't feet stuff be banned too?
Stars formed, planets coalesced, and on at least one of them life took root.
Through a long process of evolution this life developed into the human race.
Humans conquered fire, built complex societies and advanced technology .
All of that so we can argue about nothing.
  Considerate: 73%  
  Substantial: 80%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 88%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 5.36  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 95%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 29%  
  Substantial: 65%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 79%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.56  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
You see the irony in my reply right?
I responded to your irony with my own, it didn't "fly straight over my deluded head" I was too fast, I caught it.
Stars formed, planets coalesced, and on at least one of them life took root.
Through a long process of evolution this life developed into the human race.
Humans conquered fire, built complex societies and advanced technology .
All of that so we can argue about nothing.
  Considerate: 66%  
  Substantial: 61%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 88%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.96  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 45%  
  Substantial: 14%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 78%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 2.44  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: irony    nbsp   lame whine    
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
There is that cognitive dissonance again...
Stars formed, planets coalesced, and on at least one of them life took root.
Through a long process of evolution this life developed into the human race.
Humans conquered fire, built complex societies and advanced technology .
All of that so we can argue about nothing.
  Considerate: 82%  
  Substantial: 25%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 86%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.26  
  Sources: 2  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: cognitive dissonance         
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 64%  
  Substantial: 41%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 81%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 2.66  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: playground of dystopia    page   dude   Post  
  Relevant (Beta): 85%  
  Learn More About Debra
I want you to know that I gave up actually trying about half-way through the 2nd page and since then I have just been having my fun chewing you up.
You probably should have given up as soon as your proposition was found to be fatally flawed on page one.
Stars formed, planets coalesced, and on at least one of them life took root.
Through a long process of evolution this life developed into the human race.
Humans conquered fire, built complex societies and advanced technology .
All of that so we can argue about nothing.
  Considerate: 65%  
  Substantial: 60%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.5  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: 2nd page    way   fun   proposition  
  Relevant (Beta): 66%  
  Learn More About Debra